Zur Haupt­na­vi­ga­ti­on sprin­gen [Alt]+[0] Zum Sei­ten­in­halt sprin­gen [Alt]+[1]

Guide to par­li­a­men­ta­ry de­ba­te

In­tro­du­cing de­ba­ting

A de­ba­te,
is not a dis­cus­sion but a blood-sport. A dis­cus­sion is to a de­ba­te what a tea-party is to a boxing match. One side wins, one loses. There is no un­de­ci­ded re­sult, no draw, no stale-mate.
A mo­ti­on (a pro­po­si­ti­on in the form of a state­ment) is fought out by two op­po­sing sides. Each team de­fends (or at­tacks) the mo­ti­on. De­ba­ters speak in turn: first pro­po­si­ti­on, then first op­po­si­ti­on, then se­cond of each, then third. The for­mat we use in class is based on the House of Com­mons.

The mo­ti­on:
De­ba­ters are pre­pa­red to speak on EIT­HER side of ANY mo­ti­on, and against ANY other team. A de­ba­te is not  a se­arch for the truth. De­ba­ters needn’t be con­vin­ced of the va­li­di­ty of their case, but do at­tempt to find the best pos­si­ble ar­gu­ments for it.

Sea­ting:
At West­mins­ter (House of Com­mons) the two sides face each other. But in the class­room we open up one end of the ta­bles to form a V shape. De­ba­ters face the class and learn to ad­dress an au­di­ence, not the op­po­sing side.

Time:
Each de­ba­te has an agreed set time-limit for the spee­ches. Be­gin­ners are happy with two to three mi­nu­tes each; at the World Cham­pi­ons­hips eight mi­nu­tes are ex­pec­ted.

For­ma­li­ty:

Ar­gu­ments should be force­ful, but not ag­gres­si­ve or rude towards the other side. De­ba­ting re­mains po­li­te!

Notes:
Spee­ches are de­li­ve­r­ed, not read out! Use palm cards. Spea­kers can hold a se­ries of cards, but must main­tain eye-con­tact with the au­di­ence. Some may choo­se to stand “pro­tec­ted” be­hind a table or ro­strum. Howe­ver, even be­gin­ners are en­cou­ra­ged to stand out front “naked”, the­r­e­by exu­ding a sense of sover­eig­n­ty.

Re­but­tal:
In ad­di­ti­on to pre­sen­ting the ar­gu­ments lis­ted in the team-line, each spea­ker (ex­cept the very first) tries to rebut (i.e. to de­s­troy) the ar­gu­ments of the others side’s pre­vious spea­ker(s).
A de­ba­te is an in­ter­ac­tion, and not a se­ries of mo­no­ma­ni­ac in­di­vi­du­als ma­king their own spe­cial pleas.

Points of in­for­ma­ti­on (POI):
Any de­ba­ter may stand up at al­most any mo­ment and ask to be al­lo­wed to ask a POI: “On a point of in­for­ma­ti­on!” – in the form of a ques­ti­on or a short state­ment no lon­ger than 15 se­conds. It’s the right of each spea­ker to ac­cept the POI (“Yes, plea­se”), or to de­cli­ne it. (“De­cli­ned!” or “No, thank you!”) If it is de­cli­ned, the ques­tio­ner must sit down strai­ghta­way wi­thout pro­test and, apart from the spea­ker’s reply, there’s no fur­ther dis­cus­sion of the point. The pur­po­se of the POI is not to eli­cit any truth or real in­for­ma­ti­on, but part­ly to dis­con­cert the spea­ker, and part­ly to show that the other side are cri­ti­cal of the ar­gu­ments being made.
POIs are al­lo­wed bet­ween the first and the last mi­nu­te of a spea­ker’s sub­stan­ti­ve speech. There are no POIs du­ring the reply spee­ches.

A Chair­Per­son,
pre­fe­r­a­b­ly an im­par­ti­al, ex­pe­ri­en­ced de­ba­ter, will open the de­ba­te, read out the mo­ti­on, in­tro­du­ce the spea­kers in turn, and an­noun­ce the re­sults at the end.

After the de­ba­te the chair­per­son waits for the ad­ju­di­ca­tors to hand in the mark sheets. Then he/she may wish to in­vi­te the au­di­ence to make any com­ment on the topic. As soon as the jud­ges come back the chair­per­son must stop any dis­cus­sion so ever­y­bo­dy can lis­ten to the de­ci­si­on and com­ments on be­half of the panel. After the ad­ju­di­ca­tor has fi­nis­hed the chair­per­son clo­ses the de­ba­te, say­ing

La­dies and gen­tle­men, thank you for your at­ten­dance and con­gra­tu­la­ti­ons to both teams for the de­ba­te. I now de­cla­re this de­ba­te clo­sed.

Time­ke­eping

A time­kee­per will si­gni­fy time el­ap­sed through the use of a bell or kno­cking on the table.
One knock or ring should be given after the first and be­fo­re the last mi­nu­te of main spee­ches, and a dou­ble si­gnal when time is over.
In de­ba­ting con­tests each main speech lasts 8 mi­nu­tes. So one knock or sound should be given after 1 mi­nu­te and 7 mi­nu­tes of main spee­ches, a dou­ble si­gnal after 8 mi­nu­tes.
Du­ring the reply spee­ches there will be a sin­gle sound 1 mi­nu­te be­fo­re the end of the reply speech and a dou­ble sound when time is over.
In de­ba­ting con­tests reply spee­ches last 4 mi­nu­tes, half of the time of main spee­ches. There will be a sin­gle sound after 3 mi­nu­tes of a sum­ma­ry speech (= reply speech) and a dou­ble sound after 4 mi­nu­tes.


What to say!

At the be­gin­ning

Mr. Pre­si­dent, Lady Chair,…

La­dies and gen­tle­men, dear fel­low spea­kers,…

We on today’s pro­po­si­ti­on/op­po­si­ti­on (stron­gly) be­lie­ve that…

I’ve di­vi­ded my talk into … main parts.

First (to begin with) we/I’d like to give you an over­view of what I/we will be tal­king about
          
Then I’ll go on (to pre­sent some de­tails of…)

Fi­nal­ly I/we will show you ……


In your speech:
The first point I’d like to make/to men­ti­on, is…
Let me say that I/we be­lie­ve that…
It seems to me/us/my team that…
Let’s look at…
I would like to em­pha­si­ze that …..
As you know ……
Let me now turn to…
As far as … is con­cer­ned…
If you take into ac­count that …….
This brings me to my next point ……
I/we would like to point out that…
The point is…
As I've said be­fo­re …
(So,) I/we are quite sure that…
I/we to­tal­ly agree with…
What I’m try­ing to say is…
Fi­nal­ly, I would like to say ……
(So,)As we have poin­ted out… /As we have pro­ved…

With a point of in­for­ma­ti­on:
As­king:
Point of in­for­ma­ti­on, plea­se sir/madam.
On that point, point of in­for­ma­ti­on, plea­se sir/madam.
In­tro­duc­tion:
Have you con­side­red…?
I was won­de­ring if you could tell us…?
I won­der if I could com­ment on that last point.
We/I can­not ac­cept that ….
Reply:
Let’s con­sider your point…
You have a point there, but…
If I un­ders­tood the ques­ti­on cor­rect­ly, you’d like to know if/how…
That’s a very good point. I would say, howe­ver, that…
Ab­so­lu­tely! That’s just what we think, but ……
That’s right, yes, I agree, but…
I’ll come back to that in a mi­nu­te.
Can we come back to that point later?
I’ll deal with that in full de­tail later.
I’d just like to fi­nish if I may.
If I could/might just fi­nish…
I’m af­raid I can/can’t agree…

At the end of your speech:
I’d like to sum­ma­ri­ze the main points:
To sum up, I think we all agree that…
We be­lie­ve that we have pro­ved that…
We can­not/will not sup­port…
For all these re­a­sons the mo­ti­on must stand/fall.
The­re­fo­re the mo­ti­on can­not/must stand.



Guide to parliamentary debate

Ge­sam­tes Do­ku­ment her­un­ter­la­den [.doc][71 KB]