Zur Haupt­na­vi­ga­ti­on sprin­gen [Alt]+[0] Zum Sei­ten­in­halt sprin­gen [Alt]+[1]

Les­son eight: tri­cky points of in­for­ma­ti­on

In for the kill: fair is foul and foul is fair

8.1.   Same pro­ce­du­re. In today's de­ba­te, the em­pha­sis is on for­mu­la­ting and prac­tising as many dif­fi­cult and in­s­idious POIs as pos­si­ble , and on learning to deal with them!

8.2. POIs often con­tain tricks or foul play : They can­not be igno­red, but must be re­co­gnis­ed and faced squa­re­ly. Here are a few sim­ple stra­te­gies for prac­tising re­spon­ding to re­cur­ring si­tua­ti­ons. POIs may con­tain...


8.2.1 . ... dis­rup­ti­on or dis­tur­ban­ce

Spea­kers will not ac­cept this in­ter­rup­ti­on, but will con­ti­nue, full of con­fi­dence:

POI: "Are you sure?"
A: "Yes, of cour­se I am!"

POI: "Where do you...​How can you...?"
A: "We have evi­dence.. There's a lot of in­for­ma­ti­on"


8.2.2. ... per­so­nal opi­ni­on dis­gui­sed as facts

Spea­kers ask for facts & fi­gu­res, em­pha­si­sing that they have the bet­ter ar­gu­ments / ma­te­ri­al:

POI: "Isn't it true that...?
" A: "No, the fact is..."

POI:"But ever­yo­ne knows that..."
A: "Aren't you con­fu­sing facts and fi­gu­res?
Peop­le who are well-in­for­med know that..."


  8.2.3. ...​clichés / pre­ju­di­ce / exag­ge­ra­ti­on / empty for­mu­las:

These are re­fu­ted by thro­wing back the ques­ti­on, and as­king for prac­tical sug­ges­ti­ons:

POI: "...​doesn't make any sense."
A: "No, it's quite clear that... What do you pro­po­se?"


8.2.4. ...​genera­li­sa­ti­ons of in­di­vi­du­al ex­am­ples:

Oppon ents can­not be per­mit­ted to doubt the spea­ker'scom­pe­tence, and so their com­pe­tence in turn is cal­led into ques­ti­on:     The worm turns

POI: As I know from my own ex­pe­ri­ence..."
A: "I'm sorry to say your per­so­nal ex­pe­ri­ence
doesn't mean we're wrong. In most cases..."


8.2.5. ... tri­vi­al de­tails or ir­re­le­vant sin­gle items e mpha­sis­ed

The de­ba­te is led back to the main ar­gu­ment and the cen­tral issue:                                                  

A: "That' not the point!"


8.2.6. ... ar­ro­gant or con­de­scen­ding in­si­nua­ti­ons.

Such at­tacks must be de­tec­ted and ex­po­sed! They are not al­lo­wed to pass!:  

POI: "Apart from your re­al­ly weak ar­gu­ment..."
A: "Where do you find it weak?"

POI: "I don't want to ana­ly­se.., but..."
A: "Plea­se do!. Don't he­si­ta­te to tell us!"


8.2.7. ...​re­fe­rence to un­k­nown ex­perts. The Hei­deg­ger-syn­dro­me

No evi­dence or quo­ta­ti­ons, facts or fi­gu­res are ac­cep­ted wi­thout scru­ti­ny:  

POI: "Didn't Plato say that...?"
A: "And do you agree? I'm not sure you're aware
that he also said...​Can you prove that?"


8.2.8. ... per­so­nal at­tacks. Do you bite your thumb at us, sir?

A coun­ter-at­tack is laun­ched: . Hoist with their own pe­tard

POI: "But you're too young to see..."
A: "That's ex­act­ly why I can see bet­ter..."

POI: "As a sen­si­ti­ve per­son, you should..."
A: "My fee­lings have not­hing to do with it."
 


wei­ter

Ge­sam­tes Do­ku­ment her­un­ter­la­den [.doc][245 KB]