Zur Haupt­na­vi­ga­ti­on sprin­gen [Alt]+[0] Zum Sei­ten­in­halt sprin­gen [Alt]+[1]

Glossa­ry

(in­clu­ding terms not used here but crop­ping up in de­ba­tes)

AD­JU­DI­CA­TORS The jud­ges, an odd num­ber, usual­ly three, but up to nine at a WSDC Final. Play no part in the ac­tu­al de­ba­te, ex­cept to ad­mo­nish un­ru­ly de­ba­ters or au­di­ence.
CHAIR

The Chair­man or Chair ("chair­per­son"?) is neu­tral and leads through the de­ba­te. He/she an­noun­ces the mo­ti­on and in­tro­du­ces the spea­kers by name. He/she calls on each spea­ker in turn to start spea­king and asks the aui­ence to ap­plaud (but is not nor­mal­ly re­s­pon­si­ble for ti­ming or for points of in­for­ma­ti­on.)

At the end the Chair re­peats the mo­ti­on, puts it to the vote, an­noun­ces the de­ci­si­on, and clo­ses the de­ba­te. The Chair is ad­dres­sed as "Madam Chair" or "Mr Chair."

The Chair must also de­ci­de on (rare) "points of order" un­less the chief ad­ju­di­ca­tor does so.

CLASH:    A de­ba­te is ipso facto a se­ries of clas­hes bet­ween two sides. With its em­pha­sis on  for­ma­li­sa­ti­on, Ame­ri­can de­ba­ting tends to in­sist on clas­hes being worked out and cle­ar­ly sta­ted at each stage of the de­ba­te
CROSS-EX­AMI­NA­TI­ON:  In the "Karl Pop­per" for­mat, after their speech each first and se­cond spea­ker is cross-ex­ami­ned by the third and first spea­kers re­spec­tive­ly of the op­po­sing side. (Third spea­kers are not cross-ex­ami­ned, and se­cond spea­kers do not cross-ex­ami­ne.) This con­sists of ques­ti­on & an­s­wer as in a court of law; the ex­ami­na­ti­on is in­ten­ded to ex­po­se flaws and in­con­sis­ten­cies in the speech. An­s­wers can be very short. Teams are al­lo­ca­ted a num­ber of mi­nu­tes du­ring which they can put their heads to­ge­ther to pre­pa­re the cross-ex­ami­na­ti­on. (-> annex 8)
DE­BA­TOR: Ame­ri­can for de­ba­ter   and now, thanks to Ame­ri­can spon­sor­ship, the cur­rent spel­ling in Eas­tern Eu­ro­pe (-> annex 8)
FLOOR DE­BA­TE: One with an au­di­ence (floor) but usual­ly wi­thout jud­ges. The  floor has a triple func­tion: to make points of in­for­ma­ti­on; to make short spee­ches bet­ween the third and the reply spee­ches; and to vote on the mo­ti­on.
FO­REN­SICS:   in BrE the sci­ence of law -court ex­ami­na­ti­on, but in AmE ano­ther term for "de­ba­ting."
KARL POP­PER:   (Ac­tual­ly Sir Karl Pop­per, the Ger­man phi­lo­so­pher working in Eng­land.) One for­mat of Ame­ri­can de­ba­ting, now the usual for­mat for coun­tries with de­ba­ting spon­so­red by the Ge­or­ge Soros Foun­da­tio­nand IDEA.
MO­TI­ON: The topic or sub­ject of a de­ba­te. As it's not a dis­cus­sion, it's in­va­ria­bly in the form of a yes/no vote. Ge­ne­ral­ly framed as: "This House be­lie­ves that..." (-> step one)
POINT OF IN­FOR­MA­TI­ON: In par­li­a­men­ta­ry-style de­ba­ting, any spea­ker ex­cept reply spea­kers can be in­ter­rup­ted by an­yo­ne on the op­po­sing team (and so­me­ti­mes from the au­di­ence) stan­ding up and as­king a ques­ti­on in the form of "On a point of in­for­ma­ti­on!", or ma­king a short state­ment. "Short" means up to 15 se­conds. The spea­ker may ac­cept this point ("Yes, plea­se?" or." Just a moent , lease." or: "I'll take that in a mo­ment." ) or re­fu­se to allow it ("De­cli­ned !"or "No, thank you!"). He/she may allow the com­ple­te ques­ti­on, or in­ter­rupt ("Yes, I got that!" ) and wave the ques­tio­ner down. The ac­tu­al spea­ker is in com­ple­te char­ge; there is no dia­lo­gue, and the ques­tio­ner must sit down when asked to. There are no points du­ring the first or last mi­nu­te of each speech (as an­noun­ced by the time­kee­per), nor du­ring the reply speech. (-> step 3 and annex 8)
RE­BUT­TAL: De­ba­ters rebut their op­po­n­ents' ar­gu­ments by sub­jec­ting the pre­vious speech to a cri­ti­cal ana­ly­sis point by point, de­mo­lis­hing ar­gu­ments and ques­tio­n­ing facts. Es­sen­ti­aö for spea­kers 2 and es­pe­cal­ly 3.  (-> step 4)
REPLY:     At the end of the de­ba­te the first or se­cond spea­ker (but never the third, who has just spo­ken) may make one final un­in­ter­rup­ted speech. This is half the length of the other spee­ches, e.g. four ins­tead of eight mi­nu­tes. Con­tra­ry to pre­ce­ding spee­ches, the op­po­si­ti­on speaks first, fol­lo­wed by the pro­po­si­ti­on (who has thus had the first and the last word in the de­ba­te.) The reply should con­tain no new in­for­ma­ti­on and should con­fi­ne its­elf to sum­ming up what each side has said, so as to leave a last fa­voura­ble im­pres­si­on. (step 5)
SUM­MA­TI­ON: Ano­ther term for the reply speech. The reply spea­ker is the sum­ma­tor .
TEAM-LINE:   All three spea­kers of a team have agreed in ad­van­ce on what as­pects each is going to deal with, so at some time du­ring his/her speech the first spea­ker will men­ti­on the ar­gu­ments the other two in the team are going to make; i.e. he/she will sug­gest a struc­tu­re for his/her side. It's then in­te­res­ting to see whe­ther they do ac­tual­ly deal with them! It's not en­ough for each spea­ker to show cle­ar­ly what just he/she is tal­king about in­di­vi­dual­ly; they are a team.​The team-line will later be use­ful for the repy speech sum­ming  up! It shows the ad­ju­di­ca­tors that the team has a struc­tu­red case. (-> step 5)
TIME­KEE­PER:     Sits be­si­de the judge and an­noun­ces (usual­ly by rin­ging a bell, kno­cking with a gavel or a gong, or ban­ging a glass) that one mi­nu­te of any speech is up, or that there is one mi­nu­te to go to the end of the speech (du­ring which times there may be no points of in­for­ma­ti­on.) At the de­si­gna­ted end of the speech the bell is rung once, and half a mi­nu­te later is rung con­ti­nu­al­ly or con­ti­nuous­ly until the spea­ker stops.
VOTE :   At the end of the de­ba­te, if there are no jud­ges, the au­di­ence (floor) votes on the mo­ti­on. This is done by ac­cla­ma­ti­on ; the Chair as­king those in fa­vour of the mo­ti­on to cry "AYE!", & then those against   to cry "NO!"; & then an­noun­cing the win­ning team. In the event of pro­test, the Chair will re­peat the vote " by show of hands ." If there are now equal votes, the Chair casts the de­ci­ding vote; there can be no draw!

wei­ter

Ge­sam­tes Do­ku­ment her­un­ter­la­den [.doc][245 KB]