Zur Haupt­na­vi­ga­ti­on sprin­gen [Alt]+[0] Zum Sei­ten­in­halt sprin­gen [Alt]+[1]

Les­son six: the team-line

New in­for­ma­ti­on on struc­tu­re:

6.1. In their group pre­pa­ra­ti­on, stu­dents de­ci­de who is to say what . In their spee­ches, spea­kers should not du­pli­ca­te each other, or re­peat old ar­gu­ments. There should be a dif­fe­rence of em­pha­sis, or dif­fe­rent as­pects.

Howe­ver, spea­kers wi­t­hin a team should com­ple­ment and not con­tra­dict each other , nor should they have to­tal­ly dif­fe­rent ap­proa­ches.

They are working as a team, so they first work out a TEAM-LINE.

There must be a red thre­ad run­ning through the de­ba­te and this should be ex­plai­ned and be seen.

6.2. Same pro­ce­du­re as the time-be­fo­re-last. But the first spea­ker gives his/her own ar­gu­ments, then GIVES the TEAM-LINE: he/she men­ti­ons what the other two will be say­ing.

Later the other two will give their ar­gu­ments, ma­king sure that they do ac­tual­ly say what the first 

spea­ker has an­noun­ced they will! They will also each refer to the team-line, and to each other.

In this way, the case is struc­tu­red, & the struc­tu­re of the spee­ches is ob­vious to jud­ges and floor.

Later the reply spea­ker will be able to make use of this team-line on which to base his/her speech.

wei­ter

Ge­sam­tes Do­ku­ment her­un­ter­la­den [.doc][245 KB]