Zur Haupt­na­vi­ga­ti­on sprin­gen [Alt]+[0] Zum Sei­ten­in­halt sprin­gen [Alt]+[1]

Les­son ten: the floor

10.1. Today the au­di­ence will play an ac­tive role. Du­ring the de­ba­te an­yo­ne in the au­di­ence ("on the

floor" as in the House of Com­mons) may stand up and ask " Point of in­for­ma­ti­on!", which is dealt with ex­act­ly in the same way as usual. Points are still re­stric­ted to 15 se­conds and may be ge­nui­ne ques­ti­ons or short state­ments. They may be ac­cep­ted or de­cli­ned.

10.2. After the first three spea­kers of eit­her side have spo­ken, the Chair may "throw the de­ba­te open to the floor." The Chair now asks in turn for a spea­ker for / against the mo­ti­on:

" Is there a spea­ker for the mo­ti­on?" - " Is there a spea­ker against the mo­ti­on?"

An­yo­ne get­ting up to speak tries to catch the at­ten­ti­on of the Chair, who de­ci­des who is to 

speak This is the equi­va­lent of "catching the Spea­ker's eye" in the House of Com­mons.

But this time state­ments can be up to one mi­nu­te each. There is no dia­lo­gue with the de­ba­ters or bet­ween mem­bers of the floor, alt­hough others may and will con­tra­dict or ex­press their ap­pro­ba­ti­on or disap­pro­ba­ti­on. (It isn't a talk show!)

10.3 . Now the Chair re­turns to the de­ba­te, cal­ling for the reply spee­ches.

10.4. Same pro­ce­du­re as usual, with em­pha­sis on floor par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on .  

This form is nor­mal in a li­vely pu­blic de­ba­te on real is­su­es. It is in­ap­pro­pria­te in a com­pe­ti­ti­on with ad­ju­di­ca­tors jud­ging the de­ba­te. One ad­van­ta­ge is that it gives de­ba­ters added time to con­sider their reply spee­ches.

wei­ter

Ge­sam­tes Do­ku­ment her­un­ter­la­den [.doc][245 KB]