Zur Haupt­na­vi­ga­ti­on sprin­gen [Alt]+[0] Zum Sei­ten­in­halt sprin­gen [Alt]+[1]

Working with points of in­for­ma­ti­on

  1. Spea­kers must learn to have the pre­sence of mind to re­fu­se a POI, even to their peer group! Should the spea­ker ac­cept or de­cli­ne? It shows con­fi­dence to ac­cept two to three du­ring the speech. It makes sense (again sho­w­ing strength) not to ac­cept any more than two to three!

  2. Even when ac­cep­t­ing a POI, the spea­ker de­ci­des when to let the ques­tio­ner speak. He/she should say, "Just a mo­ment" and go on to fi­nish his/her sen­tence or pa­ra­graph or train of thought, be­fo­re say­ing "Yes plea­se?" (That's fun!) It's es­pe­cial­ly weak to ac­cept a POI in the midd­le of your own sen­tence!

  3. Even when ac­cep­t­ing the POI, the spea­ker can de­ci­de how long the point can go on for. He/she can in­ter­rupt the POI at any time, say­ing so­me­thing like,"Yes, I got that" or "Yes, I un­der­stand" or "Plea­se sit down!" and then go on with his/her speech. This needs prac­tice but it's ano­ther sign of con­fi­dence (and it's fun, too!).

  4. The worm turns: To be ex­cep­tio­nal­ly ef­fec­tive, the spea­ker can ac­cept a POI by fi­nis­hing some train of thought and go on to ask the ques­tio­ner: "Don't you think so?" That may knock the ques­tio­ner him­s­elf off his feet, as the onus is now on him/her to fit in his/her POI!

  5. In their reply to a POI, spea­kers can say so­me­thing like, "Our next spea­ker will deal with that ques­ti­on" - but this is dan­ge­rous. What if the next spea­ker doesn't or can't deal with it? That'll mean a score for the other side!

  6. In their reply to a POI, spea­kers will ad­dress the chair ("Madam Chair"), & look at the au­di­ence or the jud­ges, NOT at the ques­tio­ner or his team. They're not star­ting a dia­lo­gue, but con­ti­nuing their speech.

  7. Same pro­ce­du­re as last time, using POIs more spa­ring­ly.


Ge­sam­tes Do­ku­ment her­un­ter­la­den [.doc][27 KB]