Zur Haupt­na­vi­ga­ti­on sprin­gen [Alt]+[0] Zum Sei­ten­in­halt sprin­gen [Alt]+[1]

An­mer­kun­gen zu den Fo­li­en

Folie 1

Der L führt kurz in das Thema der Stun­de (Books can give you 'wings', gerne auch an­knüp­fend an die vor­an­ge­gan­ge­ne Li­te­ra­tur­be­hand­lung im Un­ter­richt), in die The­ma­tik des Fil­mes und in die Szene ein.

Hazel Grace, a 16-year-old girl with can­cer that has spre­ad to her lungs, is forced to at­tend a sup­port group where she meets and later falls in love with Au­gus­tus, a 17-year-old bas­ket­ball play­er and am­pu­tee. The scene shows the be­gin­ning of their fri­endship. Au­gus­tus takes Hazel home for the first time and she meets his par­ents. They try to get to know each other bet­ter by tal­king about what is im­portant for them.

Film­se­quenz

Der L stellt die View­ing task:

Find out why books are so im­portant for Hazel and Au­gus­tus.

 

Folie 2

Die S dis­ku­tie­ren die Er­geb­nis­se (zu­erst mit dem Part­ner, dann) im Ple­num.

Hazel: Li­te­ra­tu­re, es­pe­cial­ly Peter van Hou­ten's novel An Im­pe­ri­al Aff­lic­tion, is very im­portant for Hazel be­cau­se she feels that the aut­hor is the only one who re­al­ly un­der­stands her fee­lings: he un­der­stands what it is like to die. Thus, he helps her to cope with her si­tua­ti­on.

Au­gus­tus: His fa­vou­rite book is a video game was made into a novel about he­roes, sa­cri­fice and lea­ving a mark on the world. Will he (Au­gus­tus) leave any­thing be­hind or will he be for­got­ten? Au­gus­tus is af­raid of ob­li­vi­on.

Step 2

What books mean to us
(Lese-Er­fah­run­gen un­se­rer S)

 

Folie 3

Der L

a) sen­si­bi­li­siert die S dafür, was zwi­schen Buch und Leser ge­sche­hen kann (wings, chal­len­ge your brain, touch your heart...),

b) er­zählt ge­ge­be­nen­falls, um das Eis zu bre­chen, von ei­ge­nen prä­gen­den Le­se­er­leb­nis­sen (auch aus Kind­heit und Ju­gend­al­ter).

Die S

c) tau­schen sich über ihre Le­seer­fah­run­gen im ge­schütz­ten Rah­men aus (Part­ner oder klei­ne Grup­pe Mit­schü­ler, die man gut kennt, ge­gen­über denen man sich öff­nen kann)

d) nen­nen/er­läu­tern(frei­wil­lig) im Ple­num ei­ni­ge Bei­spie­le.

Step 3

View­ing: The Fault in our Stars. Mee­ting Peter van Hou­ten  (Scene 17, 1:01:00-1:07:35)

Der  L lei­tet über zur Frage, ob die S schon ein­mal in ihrem Leben so fas­zi­niert oder ir­ri­tiert... waren von einem Buch, dass sie gerne den Autor kon­tak­tiert/mit ihr/ihr ge­re­det hät­ten.

 

Folie 4

Der L führt kurz in die Szene ein:

Hazel des­pe­ra­te­ly wants to con­tact Peter van Hou­ten. Au­gus­tus helps her to do so by clai­ming this is his last wish. Both of them are con­cer­ned with the ques­ti­on of what will hap­pen after they die as their can­cers are po­ten­ti­al­ly ter­mi­nal. They are haun­ted by dif­fe­rent fears. Au­gus­tus wants to do so­me­thing he­roic be­fo­re he dies and thus be more si­gni­fi­cant. Hazel needs to know that those close to her, es­pe­cial­ly her mo­ther, will be able to carry on after her death. In van Hou­ten's novel, Anna dies. Then the novel ends ab­rupt­ly. Hazel wants to know how Anna's mo­ther has coped with the si­tua­ti­on. She needs to know that Anna's mo­ther has so­mehow sur­vi­ve­dand been able to deal with this loss.

 

Folie 5 / Film­se­quenz

Der L stellt die View­ing task:

Find out why the mee­ting is a com­ple­te di­sas­ter.

Which mi­sun­der­stan­dings or clas­hes can you iden­ti­fy?

Die S dis­ku­tie­ren die Er­geb­nis­se (zu­erst mit dem Part­ner, dann) im Ple­num, spe­ku­lie­ren über die Grün­de für das Ver­hal­ten van Hou­tens (der L gibt Zu­satz­in­fos), er­ör­tern die Frage, wo die Gren­zen lie­gen be­züg­lich der Funk­ti­on von Bü­chern als 'Le­bens­hil­fe: Im­puls: What are the chan­ces and li­mi­ta­ti­ons of li­te­ra­tu­re? (Wings etc..,. in­cen­ti­ves to come to grips with your si­tua­ti­on, no so­lu­ti­ons.....)

Van Hou­ten is a mean-spi­ri­ted drunk. He in­sults Hazel (chil­dish, fai­led ex­pe­ri­ment in mu­ta­ti­on...).
Clash: dif­fe­rent views about li­te­ra­tu­re:
Hazel wants to find out how the cha­rac­ters fare after the book ends: For her, cha­rac­ters have a life even after the end of a novel;
van Hou­ten says they are just cha­rac­ters; they are not alive, and they are not peop­le.
His mo­ti­ve for wri­ting the novel: his own daugh­ter died of can­cer and he is still suf­fe­ring im­men­se­ly; the­re­fo­re, he can­not ful­fill Hazel's needs. Later he apo­lo­gi­zes at Au­gus­tus' fu­n­e­ral.

Step 4
(op­tio­nal)

A Per­so­nal Let­ter from Lois Lowry - what books mean to Lois Lowry
(Li­te­ra­tu­re and a per­son's re­s­pon­se to it)

 

Folie 6 / Works­heet Lowry

Die S be­ar­bei­ten op­tio­nal das Works­heet' A Per­so­nal Let­ter from Lois Lowry' aus dem Ma­te­ri­al­fun­dus der Li­bra­ry of Con­gress (Let­ters About Li­te­ra­tu­re http://​read.​gov/​let­ters/)

Sie ler­nen Bei­spie­le ken­nen, wie kurze Brie­fe an einen Autor aus­se­hen kön­nen, was sie zum In­halt haben kön­nen und wie sich die In­hal­te im Laufe des Her­an­wach­sens ver­än­dern kön­nen.

Stu­dents find out about Lowry's con­cept of a 'wri­ter,' about the ac­ces­si­bi­li­ty of 'dead' aut­hors (by crea­ting a book, an aut­hor lives on), about Lowry's re­s­pon­se to aut­hors at va­rious times of her life, as a child, teen­ager etc. "The books that mat­ter most to us will chan­ge as we our­sel­ves grow and ex­pe­ri­ence many of life's chal­len­ges." The stu­dents find out about 'gifts' the aut­hors give, e.g. the rea­liza­t­i­on that Lowry was not the only one who felt a cer­tain way, e.g. com­fort or the ex­ci­te­ment of watching so­meo­ne else’s life. They find out about the 'pri­va­te' re­la­ti­ons­hip bet­ween an aut­hor and a re­a­der: no two peop­le ex­pe­ri­ence the same book in quite the same way.

Lois Lowry, Ame­ri­can wri­ter: The Giver (1994), is known for wri­ting about dif­fi­cult sub­ject mat­ters, com­plex is­su­es, such as ra­cism, ter­mi­nal ill­ness, ques­tio­n­ing aut­ho­ri­ty, etc. Prai­se and cri­ti­cism.

Step 5

Let­ters About Li­te­ra­tu­re - the con­test

 

Fo­li­en 7 und 8

Der L in­for­miert die S über den Wett­be­werb der Li­bra­ry of Con­gress: das Ziel, die Rah­men­be­din­gun­gen, das von den Sn er­war­te­te Vor­ge­hen.

Der L mo­ti­viert für die cul­mi­na­ting task.

Level 1: gra­des 4-6; Level 2: gra­des 7-8; Level 3: gra­des 9-12. Jud­ges choo­se the top let­ters in each com­pe­ti­ti­on level for their state. Each state awards pri­zes to win­ning par­ti­ci­pants. The first-place state-level win­ners ad­van­ce to the na­tio­nal level jud­ging. Na­tio­nal win­ners in each com­pe­ti­ti­on level will re­cei­ve 1000 Dol­lar cash award.

Read: select a book (fic­tion) that you have read and about which you have strong fee­lings. It might be a book which hel­ped you through a dif­fi­cult time or it might be a book that sim­ply tou­ched you or in­spi­red you.

Re­flect: Think be­fo­re you write: How did the aut­hor’s work chan­ge you or your view of the world? How do you know it did? How and why are you dif­fe­rent now than you were be­fo­re you read this work?

Per­sua­de: Write a per­so­nal let­ter to the aut­hor sta­ting how rea­ding his or her work chan­ged you. Be per­so­nal but also per­sua­si­ve. Sup­port your ideas with spe­ci­fic de­tails, in­clu­ding de­tails from the work its­elf. This is not a fan let­ter but ra­ther a re­flec­tion on how the aut­hor in­flu­en­ced you.

Write: Type your entry in let­ter for­mat. Your name and com­ple­te re­turn ad­dress must ap­pe­ar in the upper right cor­ner of the first page of the let­ter.

Send: Mail your let­ter by the dead­line date.

 

 

Ver­lauf: Her­un­ter­la­den [docx][25 KB]

Ver­lauf: Her­un­ter­la­den [pdf][92 KB]

 

Wei­ter zu Ana­ly­se