Zur Haupt­na­vi­ga­ti­on sprin­gen [Alt]+[0] Zum Sei­ten­in­halt sprin­gen [Alt]+[1]

Scaf­fol­ding 1

Ana­ly­sis Works­heet 1 Scaf­fol­ding 1 .............'s Let­ter to the Aut­hor
Here are some Ideas which might help you fill in the grid.

 

Con­tent: What is the pa­ra­graph about?

Which as­pects of the novel are men­tio­ned? Which as­pects of the re­a­der's life does he/she state? Does the aut­hor give you any ar­gu­ments, ex­pla­na­ti­ons or ex­am­ples? What fee­lings or in­sights does the aut­hor have? Does the aut­hor tell you any­thing about his/her plans for the fu­ture?

 

Textu­al Co­he­rence/Pur­po­se: How does the pas­sa­ge cont­ri­bu­te to de­ve­lo­ping the the­sis…..?

…. by re­la­ting per­so­nal ex­pe­ri­en­ces? ….by hoo­king the re­a­der? …. by pro­vi­ding evi­dence? …. by na­ming the issue?…. by sum­ma­ri­zing/con­clu­ding? … by sup­porting a cer­tain point of view? … by es­ta­blis­hing links? etc.

 

Lin­gu­is­tic de­vices: What lan­gua­ge de­vices does the wri­ter use?

List chunks and phra­ses the wri­ter uses at cer­tain sta­ges in the let­ter, e.g. “from the very first words that were writ­ten...” /
“I soon rea­li­zed that it…” /“... was my wake-up call,” etc...  Focus on phra­ses which you find use­ful for wri­ting a LAL.

 

Your per­so­nal cri­ti­cal eva­lua­ti­on: To what extent do you like/dis­li­ke what you are rea­ding? Why?

Do you think the text is ori­gi­nal, per­sua­si­ve, au­then­tic, lo­gi­cal or co­he­rent?
You might con­sider whe­ther this let­ter is/isn't worth rea­ding.
You might just write down any as­so­cia­ti­ons you have while rea­ding.

 

 

Scaf­fol­ding: Her­un­ter­la­den [docx][15 KB]

Scaf­fol­ding: Her­un­ter­la­den [pdf][49 KB]

Scaf­fol­ding 2: Her­un­ter­la­den [docx][15 KB]

Scaf­fol­ding 2: Her­un­ter­la­den [pdf][40 KB]

 

Wei­ter zu Scaf­fol­ding 2