Zur Haupt­na­vi­ga­ti­on sprin­gen [Alt]+[0] Zum Sei­ten­in­halt sprin­gen [Alt]+[1]

Me­tho­de Sta­tis­tik bi­lin­gu­al

In­fo­box

Diese Seite ist Teil einer Ma­te­ria­li­en­samm­lung zum Bil­dungs­plan 2004: Grund­la­gen der Kom­pe­tenz­ori­en­tie­rung. Bitte be­ach­ten Sie, dass der Bil­dungs­plan fort­ge­schrie­ben wurde.

I     De­scri­bing:

  • title
  • sour­ce of in­for­ma­ti­on
  • ele­ments of the pre­sen­ta­ti­on , i.e. table, line graph, bar graph, pie graph, co­lumns, seg­ments
  • va­ria­bles , i.e. pe­ri­od, coun­tries, goods, elec­tion re­sults, groups of peop­le…
  • units , i.e. ab­so­lu­te num­bers, re­la­ti­ve num­bers (per cent, index, re­fe­rence fi­gu­res ( Be­zugs­zah­len ))…
  • con­tent/ im­portant state­ments , i.e. dis­tan­ce, in­crea­se/de­crea­se of va­lues, peaks and lows ( Hoch- und Tief­punk­te )…
  • re­la­ti­ons , i.e. com­pa­ri­son of par­ti­cu­lar fi­gu­res, co­lumns,
    lines, in­di­ces …

II    Ex­plai­ning with re­fe­rence to the his­to­ri­cal con­text:

  • re­fer­ring to the his­to­ri­cal con­text , i.e. in­dus­tria­li­sa­ti­on, take-off, high in­dus­tria­li­sa­ti­on, first elec­tions of the Wei­mar Re­pu­blic, eco­no­mic de­ve­lop­ment in the 1950s, the Cold War
  • ex­plai­ning the state­ments with re­fe­rence to the his­to­ri­cal con­text
    • re­la­te ( zu­ord­nen ) si­gni­fi­cant chan­ges to the his­to­ri­cal con­text
    • ac­count for ( be­grün­den ) si­gni­fi­cant chan­ges using the his­to­ri­cal con­text
    • cor­re­la­te ( in Be­zie­hung set­zen ) dif­fe­rent in­for­ma­ti­on

III   As­ses­sing the evi­dence ( Aus­sa­ge­wert über­prü­fen ):

  • as­ses­sing the si­gni­fi­can­ce of the evi­dence (Aus­sa­ge­wert des Da­ten­ma­te­ri­als prü­fen) , i.e.
    • sour­ce of data :  is there evi­dence of ma­ni­pu­la­ti­on (i.e. GDR ( DDR )-data), could the data have been com­pi­led for pro­pa­gan­da??
    • cal­cu­la­ti­on of the data: i.e. is the data pool suf­fi­ci­ent in order to make a re­pre­sen­ta­ti­ve state­ment? Is the amount of data use­ful or are there only aver­ages to cover a cer­tain pe­ri­od of time? Cal­cu­la­ti­ons ( Be­rech­nung ) or roun­ded fi­gu­res, esti­ma­ti­ons, pro­jec­tions ( Hoch­rech­nung )?
  • as­ses­sing the va­ria­ble (Va­ria­ble prü­fen) , i.e.
    • lo­ca­ti­ons: i.e. “Ger­ma­ny” - which area and when? Does the area of re­fe­rence chan­ge du­ring the given pe­ri­od of time?
    • de­fi­ni­ti­ons : i.e. does the de­fi­ni­ti­on of “pri­va­te hou­se­hold” (4 peop­le with an aver­age in­co­me) match?
  • as­ses­sing the selec­tion and com­bi­na­ti­on of va­ria­bles , i.e.:
    • pro­blem of iso­la­ted state­ments: i.e. The length of rail­way ki­lo­metres can­not be used to ex­plain the den­si­ty ( Dich­te ) of the net­work. The num­ber of peop­le doesn’t refer to the den­si­ty of peop­le, the de­crea­se of em­ployees in per cent in a sec­tor needn’t refer to the ab­so­lu­te de­crea­se if the eco­no­my grows and the num­ber of peop­le in­crea­ses.
  • as­ses­sing the com­pa­ra­bi­li­ty (Ver­gleich­bar­keit prü­fen) , i.e.
    • as­ses­sing the selec­tion and com­bi­na­ti­on of va­ria­bles (see above)
    • date/ unit: Do pe­ri­ods of time and in­ter­vals match? Are com­pa­ri­sons pos­si­ble if the units are dif­fe­rent?
    • re­la­ti­ve num­bers: pro­duc­tion num­bers in per cent can be used to com­pa­re growth in dif­fe­rent coun­tries, but do not allow con­clu­si­ons  about the ab­so­lu­te vo­lu­me of pro­duc­tion, i.e. FDR ( BRD )/ GDR.
  • as­ses­sing and sum­ma­ri­zing the si­gni­fi­can­ce and in­for­ma­ti­ve value
    • as­ses­sing the data pool
    • as­ses­sing the state­ments

 

Me­thod: Ana­ly­sing sta­tis­tics: Her­un­ter­la­den [doc] [32 KB]