Bei­spiel­lö­sun­gen

K1
2.​Halb­jahr
Klau­sur Nr.1
3rd March 2010

Ana­ly­sis: sum­ma­ri­se the fol­lo­wing text in Eng­lish
Text: http://​www.​spie­gel.​de/​po­li­tik/​deutsch­land/​0,1518,670113,00.​html (ge­kürzt)
_______________________________________________________________­_­_­_­_­_­_­_­_­_­_­_­_­_­_­_­_­_­_­_­_­_­__
A
The ar­ti­cle pu­blis­hed in the Ger­man ma­ga­zi­ne „Der Spie­gel“ is about the dis­pu­te of the use of bo­dy­scan­ners. After a man was suc­cess­ful by brin­ging a bomb on bord of a plane last Christ­mas some coun­tries again began to use bo­dy­scan­ners. But there are some peop­le who now say that these bo­dy­scan­ners are against the right of pro­tec­tion against child-por­no­gra­phy. They want that child­ren under the age of eigh­teen don´t have to pass these scan­ners. Ex­cep­ti­ons of cour­se must be pos­si­ble but then the si­tua­ti­on has to be more dan­ge­rous than it is now. At the mo­ment bo­dy­scan­ners aren´t used of­fi­cia­ly neit­her in Ger­ma­ny then in Great Bri­tan but the EU par­li­a­ment wants to allow bo­dy­scan­ners in the EU due to a mo­dern ver­si­on in which the scan­ners don´t show per­sons com­ple­te­ly na­cked. Last but not least other per­sons also want a law which say that it´s for­bid­den to give the in­for­ma­ti­ons away.

B
The fol­lo­wing text is a sum­ma­ry of an in­ter­net ar­ti­cle about new bo­dy­scan­ners. Peop­le in Bri­tain have doubts be­cau­se of their per­so­nal rights.
Ac­tivists mean that the new bo­dy­scan­ners hurt the law. The text in­forms us about an air­port in Man­ches­ter where the bo­dy­scan­ners are tested but only for peop­le who are older than 18 years old. That was a de­ci­si­on of “Ac­tion for Rights of Child­ren”. The text tells us theat bo­dy­scan­ners are not of­fi­ci­al in Bri­tain and Ger­ma­ny. The go­vern­ment ex­plai­ned that they wait for the se­cond ge­ne­ra­ti­on of bo­dy­scan­ners. Per­haps they pro­tect more the pri­va­cy of peop­le. Peter Schaar ex­plai­ned in the “Frank­fur­ter Rund­schau” that is not en­ough that you can´t see naked peop­le on the mo­ni­tors any­mo­re.  The pro­tec­tor of data (Peter Schaar) cri­ti­ci­zes that the po­li­ce de­ci­des about the per­so­nal rights in con­text to the de­ve­lop­ment of bo­dy­scan­ners.
In con­trast, Klaus-Hei­ner Lehne (CDU) wants that until spring, bo­dy­scan­ners are al­lo­wed in the EU. In his view the mo­dern bo­dy­scan­ners don´t show peop­le naked. Since Christ­mas there´s a new dis­cus­sion about bo­dy­scan­ners, be­cau­se there was a plain, in which a ter­ro­rist tried to make an ex­plo­si­on. On the air­port in Ams­ter­dam no­bo­dy no­ti­ced him.

C
The text is about the dis­pu­te of per­so­nal rights. The re­a­son for this dis­pu­te are the new bo­dy­scan­ners pre­pa­ring to be used on air­ports. Ac­tivists are ar­guing that these bo­dy­scan­ners might break laws, e.g. the child­ren se­cu­ri­ty law of 1978. Quo­ta­ti­ons out of a news­pa­per say that the dan­ger has to be more spe­ci­fic and the vi­de­os mustn´t get of­fi­ci­al, es­pe­cial­ly if the pas­sen­gers are fa­mous. The first ge­ne­ra­ti­on of bo­dy­scan­ners isn´t ac­tual­ly used neit­her in Bri­tain nor in Ger­ma­ny. “I´ve never seen a de­vice right now, that does save the per­so­na­li­ty rights” said Peter Schaar, the go­vern­men­tal actor for in­for­ma­ti­on se­cu­ri­ty. He de­man­ds, that the bo­dy­scan­ners have to get bet­ter de­ve­l­o­ped in a tech­ni­cal man­ner. But there are not only cri­tics against the use of bo­dy­scan­ners. Klaus-Hei­ner Lehne for ex­amp­le sup­p­lies the use of bo­dy­scan­ners. Ac­cor­ding to a quo­ta­ti­on out of the news­pa­per “Neue Os­na­brü­cker Zei­tung” he thinks that it is a com­ple­te­ly new si­tua­ti­on after the preven­ted at­tack of De­troit.  The dis­pu­te has star­ted again after a 23 years old Ni­ge­ri­an tried to de­to­na­te e bomb on board of a plane. He didn´t have any dif­fi­cul­ties to smugg­le his bomb on board of the ma­chi­ne.

Wenn man die neu­es­ten Ent­wick­lun­gen be­züg­lich der Sprach­mitt­lungs­auf­ga­ben be­rück­sich­tigt, könn­te hier eine Auf­ga­be so lau­ten:
Sum­ma­ri­se the given ar­ti­cle and re­la­te the ar­gu­ments given in the Eng­lish text to it (do they ve­ri­fy or fal­si­fy the Ger­man text?).

http://​www.​guar­di­an.​co.​uk/​po­li­tics/​2010/​jan/​04/​new-​scan­ners-​child-​porn-​laws

Bei­spiel­lö­sun­gen: Her­un­ter­la­den [doc] [28 KB]