Zur Haupt­na­vi­ga­ti­on sprin­gen [Alt]+[0] Zum Sei­ten­in­halt sprin­gen [Alt]+[1]

Oral exam 2

In­fo­box

Diese Seite ist Teil einer Ma­te­ria­li­en­samm­lung zum Bil­dungs­plan 2004: Grund­la­gen der Kom­pe­tenz­ori­en­tie­rung. Bitte be­ach­ten Sie, dass der Bil­dungs­plan fort­ge­schrie­ben wurde.

„Oral Exam“ Bei­spiel 2

1. Mo­no­lo­gi­sches Spre­chen mit Leh­rer­im­pul­sen

Part­ner A: You are to speak for about 8-10 mi­nu­tes.

  1. De­scri­be the photo (Bel­fast wall; sol­diers pa­trol­ling in the streets) Picturescan easily be found!!!
  2. State your opi­ni­on: The Bri­tish should have pul­led out of Nort­hern Ire­land much ear­lier.
  3. Dis­cuss the dif­fe­ren­ces bet­ween being brought up in Ger­ma­ny and in Nort­hern Ire­land.

Part­ner B: You are to speak for about 8-10 mi­nu­tes.

  1. De­scri­be the photo (graf­fi­ti on Bel­fast walls, child­ren loo­king at Bri­tish sol­diers).
  2. State your opi­ni­on: It’s al­ways child­ren that suf­fer most.
  3. Dis­cuss the pros and cons of Irish re­uni­fi­ca­ti­on.

2. Dia­lo­gi­sches Spre­chen (10 mi­nu­tes)

Tal­king about the novel

Dis­cuss the state­ments below with your part­ner. Bear in mind what we dis­cus­sed in class/pre­sen­ted in front of the group and try to reach an agree­ment: Kevin and Sadie have hel­ped over­co­me the deep-sea­ted hat­red bet­ween Pro­tes­tants and Ca­tho­lics in Nort­hern Ire­land.

  1. Not ce­le­bra­ting the “Tw­elfth” was com­ple­te­ly wrong be­cau­se it’s im­portant to cling to old tra­di­ti­ons.
  2. Two young teen­agers in love doesn’t mean any­thing in a con­flict of such his­to­ri­cal im­port­an­ce.
  3. A day on the beach ins­tead of being “in the midd­le of it” shows that po­li­tics do not re­al­ly trou­ble young peop­le.
  4. Kevin and Sadie should just have stay­ed with their own peop­le.
  5. The open en­ding of the novel shows that not­hing has chan­ged.
  6. Their story has not­hing to do with me whatsoever.

 

3. Spre­chen in der Tria­de (S-S-L) - 10 mi­nu­tes

You have dis­cus­sed the novel at length and have hope­ful­ly come to an agree­ment. Pre­sent your agree­ment to an ima­gi­na­ry au­di­ence but you have to chan­ge your speech ac­cor­ding to the tasks below. Your teacher may in­ter­vene or be­co­me part of the talk.​One spea­ker starts, spea­ker 2 takes over when he feels like it:

  1. Speak about your agree­ment to a group of teen­agers.
  2. Ju­s­ti­fy your de­ci­si­on in front of the aut­hor.
  3. Ex­plain to your teacher how you re­ached your agree­ment.

Be­mer­kun­gen: Die 3 Teile der münd­li­chen Prü­fung sind auf­ein­an­der ab­ge­stimmt und be­han­deln ein zuvor in­ten­siv be­han­del­tes Thema. Der Schü­ler muss gemäß den Bil­dungs­stan­dards ganz be­stimm­te Kom­pe­ten­zen und „skills“ vor­wei­sen, die in ver­schie­de­ner Form und Aus­prä­gung zum Tra­gen kom­men. Aus­rei­chend Vor­be­rei­tungs­zeit soll­te ein­ge­räumt wer­den. Im ers­ten Teil (mo­no­lo­gue) soll­te der Schü­ler frei spre­chen, wird aber durch ver­schie­de­ne Leh­rer­im­pul­se ge­steu­ert.

Je nach In­ten­ti­on und Mög­lich­kei­ten ist auch eine münd­li­che Prü­fung in der Tria­de (siehe oben) denk­bar.

(Zu Kom­pe­ten­zen siehe auch Stun­den­kon­zep­ti­on)

 

 

The 12th of July Leis­tungs­mes­sung: Her­un­ter­la­den [pdf] [443 KB]